Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Re: [olympiaworkers] Status of Pizza Time?

The first political action that the Pizza Time workers (who went on strike
and were locked out) took was making pizzas for peace advocates down at
the port during a military shipment. One of the workers crossed onto port
property to give the cops a peace-sign pepperoni pizza. That worker was
threatened with arrest for that action. Other pizza time workers delivered
lots of free pizzas to peace advocates who later brought down the port
fence for the first time.

It comes to no surprise to me that Heath Flores, the current owner of
Pizza Time, would try this sort of publicity stunt to create divisions in
the Olympia Community. Heath Flores is a former repo man who has lots of
tricks up his sleeve. He wants to put the Pizza Time Strike and lock out
behind him and make a buck in Olympia. Please do not fall for his tricks.

Heath Flores locked us out of our jobs. I worked at Pizza Time for two
years at minimum wage. All we wanted to return to work was for Heath to
put it in writing that we would not be fired or discriminated against once
things got back to normal. Heath Flores never gave us a chance and hired
the scabs you see today.

If you advocate justice, do not eat Pizza Time pizza even if it is free.

In struggle and solidarity,

Joe

p.s. Feb 12 was the two year anniversary of when all the workers at
Olympia Pizza Time stood up for themselves and went on strike. I'm still
on strike!

Monday, February 12, 2007

Re: [olympiaworkers] Status of Pizza Time?

We had Pizza and other food from various sources during Camp Quixote I.
In many cases we were cautioned not to thank the establishments because we
might get the employees, who were the actual donators, in trouble. In at
least one other case a well wisher simply bought us Pizza from somewhere.

It is not unusual, in this oppressive economy and system, for employees to
see helping the poor as a satisfying act of rebellion. Every truck driver
who gives a hitch hiker a ride is doing an act of rebellion against the
trucking company. Fast food employees will often just silently do a free
upgrade to a big sandwich from a dollar menu. Truck stop employees will
quietly give you free showers and look the other way when you roll up in a
tarp on the lot, and waitresses will whisper a go ahead to fill up on the
Buffet, then cancel your check for coffee.

This is often followed by them confiding in you about how terrible it is
since the independent business got taken over by the big corporation or
whatever. I have been traveling low to the ground for a few years now,
there is a hell of a lot of simmering rebellion out there. Camp Quixote
brought some of that out that out in Olympia.

Love, Solidarity and Magic
Jesse

> So, on a couple occasions I saw a Pizza Time delivery guy bring a big pile
> of Pizza Time pizzas to Camp Quixote. This raises a lot of questions,
> given
> the big lockout and strike a couple years back in which a whole unionized
> staff was fired.
>
> 1) Were the pizzas bought, or were they donated?
>
> 2) If they were bought, Why the Hell are we buying our pizzas at Pizza
> Time?
>
> 3) If they were donated by Pizza Time to the homeless for tent city, does
> that not change things? Time to at least re-evaluate the ongoing
> blacklisting of Pizza Time? I know, a few free pizzas is a small, small
> gesture considering Pizza Crime's history in Olympia. Buuuut, if Pizza
> Time's owners had reconsidered their stance, is this not how they might
> first show it?
>
> 4) Should there be no re-evaluation of Pizza Time based on the notion that
> our reconsideration cannot be bought with a few pizzas? Or should a
> gesture
> perhaps be made to re-open discussions with it's owners as to how to make
> their business respectable again, if maybe that's what they want?
>
> Any thoughts?
> -Wally
>

Re: [olympiaworkers] Status of Pizza Time?

First off, it was a walk out, not a lock out.  I think they walked out for very good reasons.  I still support their decision to strike.  Unfortunately, they were not officially unionized when they went on strike, so they had no rights guaranteed to striking workers. 
 
Secondly, you're right.  The new owners did know of the situation, which means they are buying a reputation.  That still doesn't obligate them to employ strikers, legally.  Morally, perhaps it is a different matter.  I must say, though, you are grossly exagerating the matter by tieing it to rape.  Not hiring a pizza cook is nothing like not stopping forced sex.  It is an analogy that is disgracetful and uncalled for.
 
As far as the right to employment, please tell me the law that states any of the workers had a right to the jobs they were striking from.  If you can tell me that, then perhaps you can tell me why the strikers don't have their jobs back.  I don't like what happened to them.  I knew them.  I like them. I picketed with them.  That doesn't mean I am going to pretend that the law was on their side.  The law is not always right.  It doesn't mean it isn't there.
 
You ask me why I am here?  Because I was there.  Just because I support them, doesn't mean I think everyone who opposes them is wrong.  I don't live in a world where everything is fair and no one is going to screw me over.  I don't know anyone who has or does, nor do I expect to know anyone who will, so I do my best to protect myself.  If you don't want at will employment, don't sign a contract making your employment at will.  You may find it hard to gain employment, but the high road is not an easy one.  You'll also find there are far less at will employment contracts outside of chain stores. 
 
Walking out was the high road, but it also made their jobs forfeit.  They knew this at the time and they did what they saw as right, anyway.  What lesson did I take away from their misfortune?  Organize.  If you want to strike and keep your job, you'd better get the law on your side.  Then there will be an obligation and a right to a job.
 
Nothing I have said in any of my emails has been in support of Pizza Time.  It has been a discussion of legality.  I do not support Pizza Time.  I have not bought pizza from them since the dispute.  I will not buy pizza from them in the forseeable future.  Not just because the owners are jerks, but because the pizza isn't that good, either.  My aim was to bring about a discussion of the events surrounding the strike.  You are awful quick to make an enemy of an ally.  Please don't mistake my arguments for an attack.  It is important to have a diversity of ideas and opinions to come to a critical conclusion.  Otherwise we are acting out of blind passion, not reason.
 
 
-Éamon
 
On 2/11/07, Wally Cuddeford <ersatzcats@gmail.com> wrote:
"He had nothing to do with the labor dispute."

Except being the new owner of the business that was continuing to lock out the striking workers, and choosing to continue that lockout.

"The corporate owners of the franchise weren't culpable in the decision."

Pizza Time Corporation could have, at several instances, intervened and at least pressured Bloking or Flores to do the right thing.  Just because there are other people to lay the blame on doesn't absolve them of not acting on a situation they were well aware of.

" 'Too bad the last bosses treated you like shit, we're staying out of it,' is, in my mind at least, a legitimate position."

What does that mean?  "Sorry you got raped in front of me.  I guess I could have stopped it, but you know, it didn't really have anything to do with me, did it?"

"The workers did not have a right to those jobs."

That's awfully turn-of-the-century of you.  Why are you on this listserv again?

"Shitty deal, but that's part of signing an at will contract." 

This is the most important thing to recognize in all this.  The business's actions are not justified by their own invented circumstances.  Making employment contracts "at will" does not all of a sudden make it so workers have no right to their own jobs.  Calling it a "new franchise", when it's the exact same company in the exact same storefront in the exact same town does not negate the previous labor dispute.  The NLRB saying this is legitimate labor relations does not negate the strikers' rights to their jobs.  These are invented circumstances which don't really change anything.

"I assume by 'basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves,' you mean they said something else that was less rude."

That wasn't a direct quote, but it was not any less rude.  I'm serious.  They were chased out of the store, and told to never, ever come back.  Flores called the cops on the workers multiple times.  This wasn't a silent shrug.  This was hostility.

"Some thing like, 'not our problem?'  Which it wasn't..."

Uh, new owners of the business that locked them out?  Could have resolved it, or even backed out and not taken any stand either way (which is an option folks who are unfairly thrust into bad situations don't usually have).  Once again, how do they not have an obligation in this?

"It would have been great if they'd employed the strikers, but that's not an obligation."


So, it would be nice if employers respected workers' rights to their jobs and to their dignity, but it's not an obligation?  Once again, Why are you here?


Love and Justice,
-Wally

On 2/11/07, E Doggy <edoggie@gmail.com> wrote:
"Surely, he could have backed out because the property owners didn't tell him everything, but he didn't.  He kept opening up the shop, and basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves, and that they had no rights to those jobs."
 
He could have, but why would he?  He had nothing to do with the labor dispute.  The dispute didn't have much, if anything, to do with anyone outside of the Blokings and other local owners.  The corporate owners of the franchise weren't culpable in the decision.  Just because a previous owner is a douche bag is no reason for someone not to buy a shop.  "Too bad the last bosses treated you like shit, we're staying out of it," is, in my mind at least, a legitimate position.  The workers did not have a right to those jobs.  Shitty deal, but that's part of signing an at will contract.  The abuse and neglect was on the Blokings, not the new owners.  I assume by "basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves," you mean they said something else that was less rude.  Some thing like, "not our problem?"  Which it wasn't...  It would have been great if they'd employed the strikers, but that's not an obligation. 
 
 
-Éamon

 
On 2/11/07, Wally Cuddeford <ersatzcats@gmail.com > wrote:
To Mike,

I think you misunderstood me.  I never suggested turning away donations of food over some sense of indignation.  But if this donation of food had a condition that all the bullcrap they've been responsible for in the past has to be forgiven in exchange for it, then it wouldn't really be a "donation", would it?  It would be self-service on their part, like when middle-class liberals donate money to Starvation Army and then go around saying they do so much for the poor homeless.

I'm not assuming anything about the Pizza Time food.  I don't know what the story behind it is.  That's why I'm asking the folks who would know.  I want to find out if this is charity or if this is solidarity, if you get my drift.

To Éamon,

They're not the original owner, Shane Bloking, but they're quite culpable themselves.  The Pizza Time strikers made it clear well before Flores et al opened up shop that there was an unresolved labor issue, which could only be resolved by rehiring the striking workers.  Yes, it sucks that they bought into the business not knowing about the issue, but sometimes that happens.  What did Flores et al do to resolve this?  Surely, he could have backed out because the property owners didn't tell him everything, but he didn't.  He kept opening up the shop, and basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves, and that they had no rights to those jobs.  Unless there's new developments, Pizza Crime got all the persecution it deserved.

Love and Justice,
-Wally




On 2/11/07, E Doggy <edoggie@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know anything about the pizzas at the camp, but I was around for the strike.
I would like to remind folks that the current owners of Pizza Time are not the owners that would not negotiate with the striking workers.  The current owners bought the shop without knowledge of the Labor dispute.  The man (Shane Bloking?  I forgot most of the names involved) who was to blame for the firings is no longer an owner.  I don't know the standing in the business of the man who owned the building, but I believe he sold his share, as well.  What remains is whether or not the new owners ever had any ethical obligation to hire on the workers fired for the walkout.  If they employed family members and a couple of friends, should said friends and family have been fired in order to rehire workers employed by a previous owner?  Perhaps they really are calous jerks and irresponsible business people.  I have been out of the loop on this issue for quite a while.  Do I have my facts wrong?  Do you disagree with me?
 
 
-Éamon

 
On 2/11/07, Wally Cuddeford < ersatzcats@gmail.com > wrote:
So, on a couple occasions I saw a Pizza Time delivery guy bring a big pile of Pizza Time pizzas to Camp Quixote.  This raises a lot of questions, given the big lockout and strike a couple years back in which a whole unionized staff was fired.

1) Were the pizzas bought, or were they donated?

2) If they were bought, Why the Hell are we buying our pizzas at Pizza Time?

3) If they were donated by Pizza Time to the homeless for tent city, does that not change things?  Time to at least re-evaluate the ongoing blacklisting of Pizza Time?  I know, a few free pizzas is a small, small gesture considering Pizza Crime's history in Olympia.  Buuuut, if Pizza Time's owners had reconsidered their stance, is this not how they might first show it?

4) Should there be no re-evaluation of Pizza Time based on the notion that our reconsideration cannot be bought with a few pizzas?  Or should a gesture perhaps be made to re-open discussions with it's owners as to how to make their business respectable again, if maybe that's what they want?

Any thoughts?
-Wally





Sunday, February 11, 2007

Re: [olympiaworkers] Status of Pizza Time?

"He had nothing to do with the labor dispute."

Except being the new owner of the business that was continuing to lock out the striking workers, and choosing to continue that lockout.

"The corporate owners of the franchise weren't culpable in the decision."

Pizza Time Corporation could have, at several instances, intervened and at least pressured Bloking or Flores to do the right thing.  Just because there are other people to lay the blame on doesn't absolve them of not acting on a situation they were well aware of.

" 'Too bad the last bosses treated you like shit, we're staying out of it,' is, in my mind at least, a legitimate position."

What does that mean?  "Sorry you got raped in front of me.  I guess I could have stopped it, but you know, it didn't really have anything to do with me, did it?"

"The workers did not have a right to those jobs."

That's awfully turn-of-the-century of you.  Why are you on this listserv again?

"Shitty deal, but that's part of signing an at will contract." 

This is the most important thing to recognize in all this.  The business's actions are not justified by their own invented circumstances.  Making employment contracts "at will" does not all of a sudden make it so workers have no right to their own jobs.  Calling it a "new franchise", when it's the exact same company in the exact same storefront in the exact same town does not negate the previous labor dispute.  The NLRB saying this is legitimate labor relations does not negate the strikers' rights to their jobs.  These are invented circumstances which don't really change anything.

"I assume by 'basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves,' you mean they said something else that was less rude."

That wasn't a direct quote, but it was not any less rude.  I'm serious.  They were chased out of the store, and told to never, ever come back.  Flores called the cops on the workers multiple times.  This wasn't a silent shrug.  This was hostility.

"Some thing like, 'not our problem?'  Which it wasn't..."

Uh, new owners of the business that locked them out?  Could have resolved it, or even backed out and not taken any stand either way (which is an option folks who are unfairly thrust into bad situations don't usually have).  Once again, how do they not have an obligation in this?

"It would have been great if they'd employed the strikers, but that's not an obligation."


So, it would be nice if employers respected workers' rights to their jobs and to their dignity, but it's not an obligation?  Once again, Why are you here?

Love and Justice,
-Wally

On 2/11/07, E Doggy <edoggie@gmail.com> wrote:
"Surely, he could have backed out because the property owners didn't tell him everything, but he didn't.  He kept opening up the shop, and basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves, and that they had no rights to those jobs."
 
He could have, but why would he?  He had nothing to do with the labor dispute.  The dispute didn't have much, if anything, to do with anyone outside of the Blokings and other local owners.  The corporate owners of the franchise weren't culpable in the decision.  Just because a previous owner is a douche bag is no reason for someone not to buy a shop.  "Too bad the last bosses treated you like shit, we're staying out of it," is, in my mind at least, a legitimate position.  The workers did not have a right to those jobs.  Shitty deal, but that's part of signing an at will contract.  The abuse and neglect was on the Blokings, not the new owners.  I assume by "basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves," you mean they said something else that was less rude.  Some thing like, "not our problem?"  Which it wasn't...  It would have been great if they'd employed the strikers, but that's not an obligation. 
 
 
-Éamon

 
On 2/11/07, Wally Cuddeford <ersatzcats@gmail.com > wrote:
To Mike,

I think you misunderstood me.  I never suggested turning away donations of food over some sense of indignation.  But if this donation of food had a condition that all the bullcrap they've been responsible for in the past has to be forgiven in exchange for it, then it wouldn't really be a "donation", would it?  It would be self-service on their part, like when middle-class liberals donate money to Starvation Army and then go around saying they do so much for the poor homeless.

I'm not assuming anything about the Pizza Time food.  I don't know what the story behind it is.  That's why I'm asking the folks who would know.  I want to find out if this is charity or if this is solidarity, if you get my drift.

To Éamon,

They're not the original owner, Shane Bloking, but they're quite culpable themselves.  The Pizza Time strikers made it clear well before Flores et al opened up shop that there was an unresolved labor issue, which could only be resolved by rehiring the striking workers.  Yes, it sucks that they bought into the business not knowing about the issue, but sometimes that happens.  What did Flores et al do to resolve this?  Surely, he could have backed out because the property owners didn't tell him everything, but he didn't.  He kept opening up the shop, and basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves, and that they had no rights to those jobs.  Unless there's new developments, Pizza Crime got all the persecution it deserved.

Love and Justice,
-Wally




On 2/11/07, E Doggy <edoggie@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know anything about the pizzas at the camp, but I was around for the strike.
I would like to remind folks that the current owners of Pizza Time are not the owners that would not negotiate with the striking workers.  The current owners bought the shop without knowledge of the Labor dispute.  The man (Shane Bloking?  I forgot most of the names involved) who was to blame for the firings is no longer an owner.  I don't know the standing in the business of the man who owned the building, but I believe he sold his share, as well.  What remains is whether or not the new owners ever had any ethical obligation to hire on the workers fired for the walkout.  If they employed family members and a couple of friends, should said friends and family have been fired in order to rehire workers employed by a previous owner?  Perhaps they really are calous jerks and irresponsible business people.  I have been out of the loop on this issue for quite a while.  Do I have my facts wrong?  Do you disagree with me?
 
 
-Éamon

 
On 2/11/07, Wally Cuddeford < ersatzcats@gmail.com > wrote:
So, on a couple occasions I saw a Pizza Time delivery guy bring a big pile of Pizza Time pizzas to Camp Quixote.  This raises a lot of questions, given the big lockout and strike a couple years back in which a whole unionized staff was fired.

1) Were the pizzas bought, or were they donated?

2) If they were bought, Why the Hell are we buying our pizzas at Pizza Time?

3) If they were donated by Pizza Time to the homeless for tent city, does that not change things?  Time to at least re-evaluate the ongoing blacklisting of Pizza Time?  I know, a few free pizzas is a small, small gesture considering Pizza Crime's history in Olympia.  Buuuut, if Pizza Time's owners had reconsidered their stance, is this not how they might first show it?

4) Should there be no re-evaluation of Pizza Time based on the notion that our reconsideration cannot be bought with a few pizzas?  Or should a gesture perhaps be made to re-open discussions with it's owners as to how to make their business respectable again, if maybe that's what they want?

Any thoughts?
-Wally




Re: [olympiaworkers] Status of Pizza Time?

To Mike,

I think you misunderstood me.  I never suggested turning away donations of food over some sense of indignation.  But if this donation of food had a condition that all the bullcrap they've been responsible for in the past has to be forgiven in exchange for it, then it wouldn't really be a "donation", would it?  It would be self-service on their part, like when middle-class liberals donate money to Starvation Army and then go around saying they do so much for the poor homeless.

I'm not assuming anything about the Pizza Time food.  I don't know what the story behind it is.  That's why I'm asking the folks who would know.  I want to find out if this is charity or if this is solidarity, if you get my drift.

To Éamon,

They're not the original owner, Shane Bloking, but they're quite culpable themselves.  The Pizza Time strikers made it clear well before Flores et al opened up shop that there was an unresolved labor issue, which could only be resolved by rehiring the striking workers.  Yes, it sucks that they bought into the business not knowing about the issue, but sometimes that happens.  What did Flores et al do to resolve this?  Surely, he could have backed out because the property owners didn't tell him everything, but he didn't.  He kept opening up the shop, and basically told the strikers to go fuck themselves, and that they had no rights to those jobs.  Unless there's new developments, Pizza Crime got all the persecution it deserved.

Love and Justice,
-Wally



On 2/11/07, E Doggy <edoggie@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know anything about the pizzas at the camp, but I was around for the strike.
I would like to remind folks that the current owners of Pizza Time are not the owners that would not negotiate with the striking workers.  The current owners bought the shop without knowledge of the Labor dispute.  The man (Shane Bloking?  I forgot most of the names involved) who was to blame for the firings is no longer an owner.  I don't know the standing in the business of the man who owned the building, but I believe he sold his share, as well.  What remains is whether or not the new owners ever had any ethical obligation to hire on the workers fired for the walkout.  If they employed family members and a couple of friends, should said friends and family have been fired in order to rehire workers employed by a previous owner?  Perhaps they really are calous jerks and irresponsible business people.  I have been out of the loop on this issue for quite a while.  Do I have my facts wrong?  Do you disagree with me?
 
 
-Éamon

 
On 2/11/07, Wally Cuddeford < ersatzcats@gmail.com> wrote:
So, on a couple occasions I saw a Pizza Time delivery guy bring a big pile of Pizza Time pizzas to Camp Quixote.  This raises a lot of questions, given the big lockout and strike a couple years back in which a whole unionized staff was fired.

1) Were the pizzas bought, or were they donated?

2) If they were bought, Why the Hell are we buying our pizzas at Pizza Time?

3) If they were donated by Pizza Time to the homeless for tent city, does that not change things?  Time to at least re-evaluate the ongoing blacklisting of Pizza Time?  I know, a few free pizzas is a small, small gesture considering Pizza Crime's history in Olympia.  Buuuut, if Pizza Time's owners had reconsidered their stance, is this not how they might first show it?

4) Should there be no re-evaluation of Pizza Time based on the notion that our reconsideration cannot be bought with a few pizzas?  Or should a gesture perhaps be made to re-open discussions with it's owners as to how to make their business respectable again, if maybe that's what they want?

Any thoughts?
-Wally


Re: [olympiaworkers] Status of Pizza Time?

I don't know anything about the pizzas at the camp, but I was around for the strike.
I would like to remind folks that the current owners of Pizza Time are not the owners that would not negotiate with the striking workers.  The current owners bought the shop without knowledge of the Labor dispute.  The man (Shane Bloking?  I forgot most of the names involved) who was to blame for the firings is no longer an owner.  I don't know the standing in the business of the man who owned the building, but I believe he sold his share, as well.  What remains is whether or not the new owners ever had any ethical obligation to hire on the workers fired for the walkout.  If they employed family members and a couple of friends, should said friends and family have been fired in order to rehire workers employed by a previous owner?  Perhaps they really are calous jerks and irresponsible business people.  I have been out of the loop on this issue for quite a while.  Do I have my facts wrong?  Do you disagree with me?
 
 
-Éamon

 
On 2/11/07, Wally Cuddeford <ersatzcats@gmail.com> wrote:
So, on a couple occasions I saw a Pizza Time delivery guy bring a big pile of Pizza Time pizzas to Camp Quixote.  This raises a lot of questions, given the big lockout and strike a couple years back in which a whole unionized staff was fired.

1) Were the pizzas bought, or were they donated?

2) If they were bought, Why the Hell are we buying our pizzas at Pizza Time?

3) If they were donated by Pizza Time to the homeless for tent city, does that not change things?  Time to at least re-evaluate the ongoing blacklisting of Pizza Time?  I know, a few free pizzas is a small, small gesture considering Pizza Crime's history in Olympia.  Buuuut, if Pizza Time's owners had reconsidered their stance, is this not how they might first show it?

4) Should there be no re-evaluation of Pizza Time based on the notion that our reconsideration cannot be bought with a few pizzas?  Or should a gesture perhaps be made to re-open discussions with it's owners as to how to make their business respectable again, if maybe that's what they want?

Any thoughts?
-Wally

[olympiaworkers] Status of Pizza Time?

So, on a couple occasions I saw a Pizza Time delivery guy bring a big pile of Pizza Time pizzas to Camp Quixote.  This raises a lot of questions, given the big lockout and strike a couple years back in which a whole unionized staff was fired.

1) Were the pizzas bought, or were they donated?

2) If they were bought, Why the Hell are we buying our pizzas at Pizza Time?

3) If they were donated by Pizza Time to the homeless for tent city, does that not change things?  Time to at least re-evaluate the ongoing blacklisting of Pizza Time?  I know, a few free pizzas is a small, small gesture considering Pizza Crime's history in Olympia.  Buuuut, if Pizza Time's owners had reconsidered their stance, is this not how they might first show it?

4) Should there be no re-evaluation of Pizza Time based on the notion that our reconsideration cannot be bought with a few pizzas?  Or should a gesture perhaps be made to re-open discussions with it's owners as to how to make their business respectable again, if maybe that's what they want?

Any thoughts?
-Wally

Friday, February 09, 2007

[olympiaworkers] meeting notes

Labor organizing/strategy meeting notes:

In attendance: Jon, Paul, Jens, Lindsey, Tom, Evan, Brendan. Members of
ILWU Local 5 and IWW as well as non-union members were present.

This is what we decided to work on:

1. Establishing a "Fire Your Boss" training. (Olympia IWW held these in
the late 1990s.) This training would teach workers about solidarity
unionism, NLRB/NLRA and labor law, general understanding of worker power,
organizing and unionizing, workplace democracy and improvements on the
job. We decided that a workshop like this could be held at Evergreen,
SPSCC, Olympia and Lacey - it should be made as accessible as possible to
workers who are often ignored.

2. Social mapping of Olympia businesses. This will include researching
where there are trends of corporatization, property and income of business
owners, where there are "hot" workplaces (places where there are a number
of problems at a job site and where workers are interested in organizing).
Specific interest was given to the bicycle and restaurant industries, as
well as organizing day laborers.

3. Flyering and canvassing was also discussed to give information to
workers and to start a face-to-face dialogue.

4. The creation and distribution of labor and union literature.

Here's our "homework":

Brendan and Lindsey agreed to meet to discuss establishing an agenda and
co-facilitating for the next meeting so it runs smoothly and efficiently.

Paul wants to research and help develop contacts with other labor and
labor rights organizations (Jobs with Justice, etc.). Jon wants to help
research labor material.

Jon and Brendan are going to raid the Evergreen Labor Center, and Bread
and Roses for OWA literature and other labor-related literature.

Evan and Jens agreed to either bring food (or suggested a potluck) for the
next meeting in 3 weeks.

Every person has to bring 2 new people to the next meeting.

We also discussed:

-The Free Choice Act. (Perhaps we can make petitions, etc. for this.)
-Unionizing versus cooperatives. Jon recommended people read an IWW
writing on this which can be found at
http://www.iww.org/en/join/collectives.shtml (A longer pdf version is at
the bottom of the page.).
-The ILWU Del Monte food boycott at Evergreen and the No Sweat campaign.
-The Starbucks Workers Union IWW protest and action planned around the
annual Starbucks shareholders meeting in Seattle March 21st.

-We also decided not to have an official group name (yet) and not to be
the OWA because of some concerns with the OWA in the past.

-We also agreed that we wanted to work hard to reach out to workers not
just at Evergreen and downtown. We want to reach out to workers at the
Mall, Lacey, etc.

The next meeting will be at 6:30 at Media Island on Thursday March 1.

Sunday, February 04, 2007

[olympiaworkers] meeting this thurs

There will be an Olympia labor strategy session Thursday February 8 at 7pm
at Media Island (816 Adams Street - near the public library).

It's open to all labor activists and organizers and the purpose of it is
to come up with a concrete plan of action for labor education, outreach,
organizing and unionizing efforts.

Spread the word.

Saturday, February 03, 2007

[olympiaworkers] Pierce County Jobs with Justice Post on Feb. 10th Peltier March

 
In this message: 1) March & Rally - Justice for Peltier Feb.10    2)Protest for Justice at Macy's Feb.17

 

Pierce County Jobs with Justice Organizing Committee Calls on All of Us to…

14th Annual March and Rally: Justice for Peltier

starts Saturday, Noon, February 10, from Portland Ave. Park, Tacoma

(on Portland Ave. between E. 35th and E. Fairbanks Ave. Take Portland Ave. exit off I-5 and head east)

RALLY 1pm, U.S. Federal Court House, 1717 Pacific Ave

For more info, contact the lead organization Tacoma Leonard Peltier Support Group at bayou@blarg.net.

 

Background

The struggle for justice for Leonard Peltier is a struggle about all of our civil rights, not just Native American people.  He organized to challenge corporate greed just as he had organized previously and locally for workplace, union, and economic justice rights.  That's why labor councils and major unions in Canada have prioritzed Peltier's struggle for justice.  To see this labor support, check out the statement of the Chair of the Canadian Labour Congress, the Canadian public sector union webpage, and the Ontario Federation of Labour Human Rights honor, two Long Lists of International Supporters including Nelson Mandela and other celebs,.  Why does Canadian labor specifically support Peltier and for more details about the event and background? see below…

 

Protest for Justice at Macy's

Saturday, February 17th, Noon

Gather at the Food Court of the Tacoma Mall

If you have any questions please call us at 253-459-5107

 

We are protesting Tacoma Macy's because it is

  • Trying to convert South Sound residents into Macy's debt-slaves.  Macy's is imposing on workers that at least once every 30 hours they must lure Macy's shoppers to apply for a credit card.  If Macy's workers fail to meet this quota, they could be fired.  To make it easier to go into Macy's debt, the company recently lowered the credit rating so that low-income and already indebted people are eligible.  Macy's credit cards have notoriously high interest rates (about 25%) and they exported the service jobs on these credit cards to countries with high poverty to avoid paying living wages locally. 
  • Refusing most Tacoma Macy's workers a raise in the last 3 years.  Now Macy's is proposing no future wage increase for over half of the employees and then cutting wages by increasing medical premiums by 11 to 29%
  • Denying over half of Tacoma Macy's workers an affordable healthcare plan and relying on taxpayers to pick up the tab
  • Corporate Greed gone wild.  Macy's parent company Federated has doubled its profits while it cut costs on workers' and shoppers' backs.  Federated sales rose to over $23 billion, driving profits well over $1.4 billion this year.  Federated CEO Terry Lundgren's 2006 salary & bonuses are $5,029,256 and other compensation amounts to Vested Stock Options of $7,050,530; Nonvested Stock Options of $8,190,810; Exercised Stock Options of $98,344. 

For more background, see the Tacoma Weekly Op-Ed article in response to the story (click on this link) and our website link (click on this)

 

More Background on the Peltier Event

PARKING:  If you get to the park early we will organize cars being moved up close to the rally site. You could also park at the Tacoma Dome Station and catch a bus. There is also parking at the park and LPSG will try to find drivers to take people back to the park after the rally.

 

For CARPOOLS from Olympia, be ready to leave from the parking lot at Harrison and Division at 10:30

 

RALLY PROGRAM:  Performances by The Aztec Dancers, United Nations Native Rap Activists, Albert Combs.  Speakers: Matilaja: Yu'Pik/Yakama and Steve Hapy and Arthur J. Miller, Tacoma LPSG; Robert Robideau Co-Director of the LPDC and Co Defendant, Shelly Vendiola: Indigenous Women's Network; David Duenas Puyallup; Juan Jose Bocanegra Jobs with Justice and Every Worker's Movement; Frank Reynolds Native American Coalition; Bill Bichsel Catholic Worker and Jobs with Justice; Zoltan Grossman Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace and Faculty Evergreen's Native American Studies

 

More Background on Peltier

Canadian labor specifically supports Peltier because the Canadian government extradited Peltier for US federal prosecution when many believed him to be a political refugee at a time that the US federal government was corrupted by Nixon's Watergate and domestic espionage.

 

Leonard Peltier is a Native American activist and was a union member in Washington State.  He went to South Dakota to support local Native American people defending land and local democracy rights from large radioactive uranium mining corporations that were trying take away reservation land in the 1970s.  The corporations hired armed guards to visit the Reservation unannounced and the situation got tense, violent, and deadly often.  The FBI intervened and also made unannounced armed visits to the reservation and during one visit, a firefight took place with differing views of how and who was responsible.  Two FBI agents were killed. 

 

In the first trial of two American Indian Movement (AIM) members who had been in the firefight, the jury came back with a verdict of not guilty by reason of self-defense.  Then the government re-charged and convicted Leonard Peltier using new judges, evidence, and witnesses.  Through appeals, Peltier's lawyers have been able to disprove the case against him to the point that the U.S. Government prosecutors have stated that they don't know what role he played in the firefight -- he was just there that day and thus aided and abetted in the deaths of the agents.

 

The federal courts have recognized the repressive nature of the government actions against American Indian Movement and Leonard Peltier. Federal Judge Heaney stated, "The United States Government overreacted at Wounded Knee. Instead of carefully considering the legitimate grievances of the Native Americans, the response was essentially a military one, which culminated in the deadly firefight on June 26, 1975."  And last year the Tenth Circuit Court found that, "Much of the government's behavior at the Pine Ridge Reservation and in its prosecution of Mr. Peltier is to be condemned. The government withheld evidence. It intimidated witnesses. These facts are not disputed."  The Eight Circuit Court of Appeals ruled "There is a possibility that the jury would have acquitted Leonard Peltier had the record and data improperly withheld from the defense been available to him in order to better exploit and reinforce the inconsistencies casting strong doubts upon the governments case."  Peltier continues to await a fair trail in prison.

 

Thirty-one years later, the FBI has refused to release over 140,000 pages of material evidence to Leonard Peltier or his attorneys.  Documents are supposed to be automatically declassified after 25 years under Executive Order 12958. The FBI is arguing that this material should not be subject to automatic declassification because it could damage or cause serious damage to national security and the war on transnational terrorism.

 

"Mr. Peltier's unjust incarceration remains a festering sore that impedes better race relations in America. Surely the time has come to promote healing and a spirit of trust and genuine goodwill toward the Indian peoples of America with an act that serves both compassion and justice."

  - Coretta Scott King

 

 "In a nation which so prides itself on a strong and incorruptible judicial system and a human and responsive government, it is sad indeed to think that in nearly a quarter of a century, justice has been elusive for this man. If the matter continues without remedy and action, it will soon be too late for any justice at all. A tragedy of this magnitude cannot be allowed."

 - Archbishop Desmond Tutu

 

South Sound Office of Washington State Jobs with Justice

3049 S. 36 St, #201

Tacoma, WA  98409-5801

(253) 459-5107

website:  wsjwj.org  Seattle office: wsjwj@igc.org

 


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.411 / Virus Database: 268.17.19/663 - Release Date: 2/1/2007